The True Cost of a Bad Hire (It's Not Just Salary)
When a hire doesn't work out, most owners calculate the cost as salary paid plus severance. That's maybe 30% of the real cost. The full impact—recruiting, training, lost productivity, team damage, and replacement costs—is staggering.
Key Takeaways
- •A bad hire typically costs 150-200% of annual salary when all costs are counted
- •Direct costs (salary, recruiting, severance) are less than half the total
- •Indirect costs (productivity, training, team impact) often exceed direct costs
- •The higher the role, the higher the multiple—executive failures can cost 400%+
You hired someone. It didn't work out. Six months later, they're gone. When you tally the cost, you think about salary paid and maybe the recruiting fee. The real cost is much higher—and understanding it changes how you think about hiring.
Research consistently shows that a failed hire costs 1.5-2x annual salary for frontline roles, and 3-5x for leadership positions. Here's where those costs actually come from.
Direct Costs
Recruiting Costs
- Recruiter fees: 15-25% of first-year salary for external recruiters
- Job postings: LinkedIn, Indeed, and industry-specific boards
- Staff time: Hours spent screening, interviewing, coordinating
- Background checks: Verification, drug screens, reference checks
Salary and Benefits Paid
The obvious cost: salary for the time employed, plus employer-paid benefits, taxes, and other compensation costs (typically 20-30% above base salary).
Training Investment
- Formal onboarding programs
- Manager and peer time for training
- Tools, equipment, workspace setup
- Learning management and certification costs
Severance and Exit Costs
- Severance payments (often 2-8 weeks)
- COBRA contributions
- Legal review (if termination is complex)
- Unemployment insurance rate increases
Direct Cost Example ($100K Salary)
Recruiting costs: $25,000 (25% fee)
6 months salary + benefits: $65,000
Training costs: $15,000
Severance: $10,000
Direct costs total: $115,000
Indirect Costs (The Hidden Majority)
Lost Productivity During Ramp-Up
New hires aren't fully productive immediately. A typical ramp to full productivity takes 6-12 months. During this time, they're producing perhaps 50-75% of expected output. For a bad hire who leaves at 6 months, you got minimal productive output.
Management Time and Attention
Struggling employees require extra management. Coaching sessions, performance discussions, documentation, and eventual termination process all consume manager hours—time not spent on productive work.
Team Impact
- Other team members absorb work that should be done
- Morale suffers when poor performers aren't addressed
- Good employees may leave if they're covering for bad ones
- Team culture and dynamics are disrupted
Opportunity Cost
The position was open (or filled ineffectively) instead of contributing. Projects were delayed. Sales weren't made. Customers weren't served. The opportunity cost of having the wrong person—or no person—is real but hard to quantify.
Customer and Quality Impact
If the role involves customers, a poor performer damages relationships. If it involves quality, mistakes happen. These downstream effects can persist long after the person is gone.
The Cascade Effect
A bad hire in a leadership role multiplies the damage. They may make additional bad hires, set wrong priorities, and damage team culture. One bad director can cost the company millions in downstream effects.
Then You Have to Do It Again
After the bad hire leaves, you're back to square one. All the recruiting costs repeat:
- New job posting and recruiter engagement
- Interview process with hiring team
- Another recruiting fee
- New training and onboarding
- Another ramp-up period
Plus, the role has been vacant or poorly filled for the duration—often 6-9 months total from original hire to replacement productive.
Total Cost Example ($100K Salary Role)
Direct costs (first hire): $115,000
Lost productivity (6 months at 50%): $50,000
Manager time and team impact: $20,000
Replacement recruiting: $25,000
Replacement training and ramp: $30,000
Total cost: $240,000 (2.4x salary)
Cost Multipliers by Role Level
| Role Level | Typical Cost Multiple | Why Higher |
|---|---|---|
| Entry-level | 50-100% of salary | Shorter ramp, less impact |
| Professional | 100-150% | Specialized skills, longer training |
| Manager | 150-200% | Team impact, harder to replace |
| Director/VP | 200-400% | Strategic impact, executive search |
| C-Level | 400%+ | Organization-wide impact |
What This Means for Hiring
Invest More in the Process
If a bad hire costs 2x salary, investing an extra $10K in better recruiting, more thorough assessment, or expert help is easily justified. Spending more time and money upfront dramatically reduces downstream costs.
Don't Rush
Pressure to fill a role quickly leads to bad decisions. The cost of leaving a role open another month is far less than the cost of a bad hire. Take time to find the right person.
Address Problems Early
Hoping a struggling employee improves rarely works. The longer you wait to address the problem, the more it costs. Early intervention (either development or exit) minimizes total damage.
Value Retention Differently
Keeping good people avoids replacement costs. Spending $10-20K on retention (raise, development, better working conditions) for an employee who might leave is almost always better than the replacement cost if they go.
The Hiring Math
For every $100K hire, you're really making a $200K+ decision when you account for potential failure costs. This should change how much time, attention, and resources you devote to getting hiring right.
Need Help Understanding People Costs?
Eagle Rock CFO helps businesses analyze the true cost of their people decisions—hiring, retention, and turnover. We provide financial frameworks that help you invest wisely in your team.
Get People Cost Analysis