Triggering Events in Buy-Sell Agreements
Understanding what activates your buy-sell agreement—and the consequences of each trigger—is essential for proper planning.
Death as a Triggering Event
From a valuation standpoint, death triggers typically use the agreed valuation mechanism without adjustment. However, some agreements include provisions for minority discounts when estate taxes require quick sales. IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60 specifies that marketability restrictions may affect value in estate contexts.
Tax consequences depend on the entity type and structure. For partnerships and S-corporations, the deceased owner's final tax return includes income from the termination of the entity status or allocation of final period income. Installment sale treatment may be available if the estate receives payments over time. For C-corporations, the interaction of estate tax and income tax creates potential double taxation issues.
Disability as a Triggering Event
The disability definition should be specific. A definition requiring the owner to be unable to perform their own occupation provides broader protection but triggers earlier. A definition requiring inability to perform any occupation is harder to meet but may defer the triggering event. The ABA Business Valuation Committee recommends precise medical standards rather than subjective assessments.
Valuation implications for disability triggers often mirror those for death—the formula or appraisal mechanism applies unchanged. However, funding disability buyouts is more complex. Life insurance does not apply; businesses must rely on disability buyout insurance, business savings, or installment structures. Disability buyout insurance policies pay benefits when an owner cannot perform their duties for a specified period, providing funds for purchase.
Divorce as a Triggering Event
The primary concern is that a non-owner spouse receives shares, then potentially becomes a passive partner with different objectives than the original owners. Alternatively, the spouse may sell the interest to a third party, introducing an unknown party into the business relationship.
Protective provisions include: mandatory buyout when divorce proceedings begin, rights of first refusal before any transfer to a spouse, restrictions on transfer to spouses entirely, and buyout rights at divorce-specific valuations (often a discount from fair market value to reflect the spouse's lack of operational involvement). The Family Law Section of the ABA Model马 provides guidance on business valuation in divorce contexts, recommending qualified appraisers with both valuation and family law expertise.
Tax consequences of divorce transfers are governed by IRC Section 1041, which generally allows tax-free transfers between spouses. However, the ultimate sale of received interests triggers capital gains or ordinary income treatment depending on entity type and basis.
Voluntary Departure and Retirement
Pricing for voluntary departures may differ from other triggers. Some agreements apply full fair market value for retirement, while others apply a discount for early departure or termination for cause. The distinction matters: a 30-year owner retiring should receive different treatment than an owner who leaves after 18 months.
Non-compete and non-solicitation provisions often accompany voluntary departure triggers. These provisions protect business value by preventing departing owners from immediately competing or taking customers. However, non-compete enforceability varies by state—California generally refuses to enforce non-competes, while other states apply reasonableness standards.
Bankruptcy as a Triggering Event
Bankruptcy triggers typically allow remaining owners or the business to purchase the bankrupt owner's interest before creditor disposition. This prevents shares from being sold at distressed prices to unknown parties. The purchase price is often at a discount to fair market value, reflecting the expedited timeline and the bankrupt owner's limited negotiating position.
The interaction between bankruptcy law and buy-sell provisions requires careful drafting. Automatic stay provisions in bankruptcy may prevent exercise of buy-sell rights without court approval. The Bankruptcy Code Section 363 allows sales of assets free and clear of interests, potentially bypassing buy-sell restrictions. Working with bankruptcy counsel when drafting buy-sell provisions ensures these scenarios are addressed.
IRC Section 1042 and Buy-Sell Considerations
If a buy-sell agreement involves a third-party sale that could qualify under Section 1042 (for C-corporations with ESOP ownership), the selling owner may have deferral opportunities. However, buy-sell agreements typically involve related-party transfers (between owners), which do not qualify for Section 1042 treatment.
Section 1042 is most relevant for business succession planning where the goal is transferring ownership to employees while deferring the owner's capital gains. This is a different structure than traditional buy-sell agreements but may be considered as an alternative for appropriate businesses. The National Center for Employee Ownership provides guidance on ESOP structuring.
Trigger Definition Matters
Valuation Adjustments by Trigger Type
Trigger Type Valuation Table
Disability: Uses full formula or appraisal value. Some agreements apply a slight discount (5-10%) reflecting the disabled owner's reduced negotiating position, though this is controversial.
Divorce: Often uses a negotiated discount (10-25%) from fair market value, reflecting the spouse's lack of operational involvement and potential for quick sale. Some agreements use specific divorce valuation formulas.
Voluntary Retirement: Uses full fair market value in most agreements. Some apply a small discount (5-10%) if departure is without adequate notice or violates non-compete provisions.
Termination for Cause: Often applies a significant discount (25-50%) from fair market value. The departing owner may receive only book value or a formula-based value without goodwill component.
Bankruptcy: Typically uses a discounted value (20-40% below fair market value) reflecting the expedited timeline and bankrupt owner's limited leverage. Some agreements use a fixed formula (e.g., 50% of book value).
Tax Planning Note
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an owner challenge the triggering event determination?
Yes, if the agreement definition is ambiguous. Disputes over whether someone is "disabled" as defined, whether a departure was "voluntary" or "for cause," or whether divorce proceedings have been initiated are common. Clear definition drafting prevents these disputes.
What happens if multiple triggering events occur simultaneously?
Agreements should specify priority when multiple triggers apply. For example, if an owner becomes disabled and then dies during the disability period, which valuation applies? Most agreements specify that the more favorable terms for the departing owner or their estate govern.
Can a triggering event be waived by remaining owners?
Some agreements include waiver provisions allowing remaining owners to elect not to purchase when a triggering event occurs. This preserves the departing owner's interest but may create unintended co-ownership situations. Waiver provisions should specify whether waiver applies to that specific transaction or creates a precedent.
How does key person insurance interact with buy-sell triggers?
Key person insurance provides liquidity to the business for operational continuity, while buy-sell insurance specifically funds the ownership transfer. Both are typically needed—the buy-sell insurance ensures the departing owner receives payment, while key person insurance provides working capital for the business to continue operating.
This article is part of our Buy-Sell Agreements: Protecting Your Business Future guide.
Related Topics: